Explanation of referees decisions (16th match day)

Wednesday, 28 December 2022
Explanations from the Cyprus Referee Commitee, regarding to the Referees team decisions from 16th round of Cyprus Cyta Championship. 
The situations which are explained, are only situations in which  VAR correctly or incorrectly intervened or did not  intervened, or did not intervene, in relation to the referees decision, according to the VAR protocol. 

DOXA - ENP, 22nd minute
REF INITIAL DECISION: OFFSIDE / NO GOAL
VAR: VAR CONFIRMATION / OFFSIDE
EXPLANATION: ASSISTANT REFEREE AND REFEREE FOLLOWED THE OFFSIDE VAR  PROCEDURE, DELAY THE FLAG  AND AFTER  THE GOAL SCORED , AWARDED OFFSIDE OFFENCE. VAR CHECKED THE SITUATION, PERFORMED THE OFFSIDE LINE PROCEDURE CORRECTLY, AND USING TRIANGULATION METHOD CORRECT SOLUTION OBTAINED BY SOFTER . VAR CONFIRMED THE REFEREE DECISION, ACCORDING TO THE VAR PROTOCOL ,CORRECTLY.


DOXA - ENP, 35th minute
REF INITIAL DECISION: GOAL 
VAR: VAR INTERVENTION / ON FIELD REVIEW – FOUL IN APP / CANCELLED THE  GOAL
REFEREE AFTER ON FIELD REVIEW: CANSELLED  THE GOAL / FOUL IN APP 
EXPLANATION : DEFENDER PLAYER ( No 11) AND ATTACKER PLAYER (No 20) TRY TO GAIN POSSESION OF THE BALL . THE DEFENSIVE PLAYER TOUCHED THE BALL FIRST AND THEN THE ATTACKER PLAYS THE BALL WHICH CLEARLY REMAINS IN HIS POSSESSION, AFTER WHICH THERE IS  A  NORMAL FOOTBALL CONTACT BETWEEN THEM . REFEREE DECIDES PLAY ON , CORRECTLY.  IN THE CONTINUATION OF THE ACTION AFTER FOUR  PASSES  ATTACKING TEAM ( ENP) SCORED THE GOAL. REFEREE AWARDED THE GOAL. VAR CHECKED THE SITUATION  AND DETERMINED THAT IT WAS A FOUL FOR DEFENDER IN APP AND  INVITED REFEREE FOR ON FIELD REVIEW FOR POSSIBLE FOUL IN APP, INCORRECTLY. REFEREE AFTER ON FIELD REVIEW CHANGE THE DECISION, INCORRECTLY.
NEA SALAMINA - AEK, 36th minute
REF INITIAL DECISION: PLAY ON
VAR: NO INTERVENTION
EXPLANATION: THE ATTACKER (No 70) FELT THAT HE WAS SLIGHTLY TOUCHED  WITH THE DEFENSIVE PLAYER ( No 51) HAND,  RIED TO FORCE PENALTY KICK  AND EASY FEEL DOWN.
REFEREE  DECIDED THAT IS NOT OFFENCE . VAR CHECKED THE SITUATION AND DID NOT INTERVENE CORRECTLY, ACCORDING TO THE VAR PROTOCOL.
PAFOS F.C - AKRITAS, 60th minute
REF INITIAL DECISION: GOAL 
VAR : VAR INTERVENTION / VAR REVIEW/ CANSELLED THE  GOAL- OFFSIDE
REFEREE AFTER VAR REVIEW: CANSELLED THE  GOAL /OFFSIDE
EXPLANATION: ASSISTANT REFEREE AND REFEREE FOLLOWED THE OFFSIDE VAR  PROCEDURE, DELAY THE FLAG IN THE VERY TIGHT SITUATION DECIDED TO PLAY ON  AND  AWARDED THE GOAL. VAR CHECKED THE SITUATION, PERFORMED THE OFFSIDE LINE PROCEDURE CORRECTLY, AND USING TRIANGULATION METHOD CORRECT SOLUTION OBTAINED BY SOFTER . VAR INTERVENED ACCORDING TO THE VAR PROTOCOL, CORRECTLY. REFEREE AFTER VAR REVIEW CHANGED THE DECISION, CORRECTLY  


ARIS – APOEL, 31st minute
REF INITIAL DECISION
: OFFSIDE / NO GOAL
VAR: VAR CONFIRMATION / OFFSIDE
EXPLANATION: ASSISTANT REFEREE AND REFEREE FOLLOWED THE OFFSIDE VAR  PROCEDURE, DELAY THE FLAG  AND AFTER  THE GOAL SCORED , AWARDED OFFSIDE OFFENCE. VAR CHECKED THE SITUATION, PERFORMED THE OFFSIDE LINE PROCEDURE CORRECTLY, AND USING  TRIANGULATION METHOD CORRECT SOLUTION OBTAINED BY SOFTER. VAR CONFIRMED THE REFEREE DECISION  ACCORDING TO THE VAR PROTOCOL ,CORRECTLY



ARIS - APOEL, 45th minute
REF INITIAL DECISION:  PENALTY KICK
VAR: VAR  NO  INTERVENTION, PENALTY CONFIRMED
EXPLANATION:  DEFENDER PLAYER No  23 STOPED THE  BALL AFTER THE BALL BOUNCED OFF
THE GROUND AND  CLEARLY TOUCHED HIS ARM WHICH WAS  CLEARLY OUT OF THE BODY AND  MAKING THE BODY BIGGER. REFEREE AWARDED THE PENALTY KICK, BECAUSE OFHANDBALL OFFENCE. VAR CHECKED THE SITUATION AND FOLLOWING THE VARPROTOCOL INSTRUCTION   DID NOT INTERVENED CORRECTLY
CONSIDERATION FOR  NO VAR  INTERVENTION:
-HAND / ARM  OUT  OF THE BODY MADE A BODY BIGGER
-BALL CLEARLY  TOUCHED  BY  THE HAND
ARIS - APOEL, 90th minute
REF INITIAL DECISION: PLAY ON
VAR: VAR NO INTERVENTION
EXPLANATION: ATTACKER  PLAYER( No 18)  AND DEFENDER  PLAYER (No 3)TRY TO GAIN POSSESION OF THE BALL IN THE PENALTY BOX  . THE ATTACKER PLAYER IMMEDIATELY AFTER FIRST TOUCHING THE BALL BEGINGS TO FALL   EXPECTING TO MAKE A CONTACT WITH DEFENDER PLAYER AND WANT TO FORCE THE PENALTY KICK. REFEREE FROM HIS GREAT POSSITION CLEARLY DECIDED TO PLAY ON. VAR CHECKED THE SITUATION VERY CAREFULLY  AND FOUND THE CLEAR EVIDENCE  FOR NO INTERVENTION ACCORDING TO THE VAR PROTOCOL, CORRECTLY.
REASON FOR NO VAR INTΕRVENTION:
-NO CLEAR TRIPPING
-NO CLEAR STEEPING ON FOOT
-MARGINAL PARCIAL SLIGHT CONTACT

Επόμενοι Αγώνες

Αχαιών 10 2413 - Έγκωμη Λευκωσία Κύπρος

Tel. : +357 22352341 , +357 77771606

Fax : +357 22590544

Postal Address : Τ.Θ. 25071, 1306 - Λευκωσία Κύπρος

Email : info@cfa.com.cy

Copyright © 2018 CFA | Privacy policy - Terms of Use - Cookie Policy | Developed and Hosted by Change your consent